A storm in a songkok

A storm in a songkok

Posted by Raja Petra
Sunday, 16 March 2008,MT

When PAS took over Kelantan in 1990, the state had debts of almost RM700 million. Today, after 18 years, Kelantan's debts are only RM11 million, which is actually just the interest on the loans and which the federal government is squeezing from the state -- the loan amount has all been repaid long ago.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

My latest piece in The Corridors of Power, Small things please small minds, appears to have attracted a lively debate. But the debate is focused only on the part about non-Malays, in particular from DAP, refusing to wear a songkok when having an audience with the Rulers, even if that audience involves getting sworn in as a State Assemblyman or State EXCO Member. This is Teng Chang Khim's latest post in his Blog in reply to my comment in that article. I have also published an earlier posting from his Blog dated 25 July 2006 plus a piece from The Star dated 11 August 2007.



Beware of the BN controlled media

Yes, I forgot to remind Raja Petra and his readers. Please beware of the BN-controlled media for digging up and pitting the old issues, including the songkok issue, against us.

Seek clarification among us, since we are in the same boat, before putting anything into writing. That will help to reduce unnecessary controversy.

Teng Chang Khim, Sunday, 15 March 2008

********************

DAP Sarawak roars

Proceedings in the Sarawak State Assembly has certainly turned lively with the emergence of the DAP 6 elected representatives.

The Sin Chew Jit Poh reported today that the 6 DAP representatives refused to wear the ceremonial dress, commonly known as No. 1 suit, while attending the opening ceremony of the assembly yesterday.

It has been the DAP policy not to wear the No. 1 suit which comes with a songkok. I have never worn one since 1995.

I had even protested when the invitation cards to attend the swearing in ceremony of Tan Sri Abu Hassan Omar as the Selangor Menteri Besar at Alam Shah palace in 1997 stated, unprecedentedly, that all the guests were required to wear songkok. Upon my protest, the directive was withdrawn.

However, the palace had later again imposed the ruling after the present Sultan came to the throne. Since then, I had never attended any official functions that required the wearing of songkok.

Teng Chang Khim, Tuesday, 25 July 2006

********************

Songkok ruling for Perlis honours recipients

THE Perlis Government has made it compulsory for non-Malays to wear a songkok when attending the investiture ceremony in conjunction with the Raja of Perlis' birthday, reported Nanyang Siang Pau.

The daily said that Chinese association and political party leaders who were honoured were caught in an awkward situation, and that some had declined to receive their titles at Istana Arau.

According to the newspaper, this was the first time such a rule was implemented. Those honoured had received the invitation and a letter that stated the requirement when attending the ceremony.

The Star, Saturday, 11 August 2007

********************

To be fair, not all DAP members abide by the anti-songkok party 'ruling' so it would be unfair of me to whack all DAP members and leaders across the board. The DAP Selangor Secretary, Lau Weng San, defied that ruling and did wear a songkok and some DAP veterans who resented Lau's action, which they view as 'trying to become a Malay' and 'selling out the Chinese', whacked him to kingdom come. Lau was brave enough to do what he thought was the right thing to do but had to suffer a tongue lashing from his fellow DAP members. He, however, just licked his wounds without any protest and chalked it up as just one of things.

Okay, if DAP has now modified its stand since it is no longer in the opposition when it first opposed the songkok ruling and now, since it is the government, it would like to tone down its anti-songkok stance, that would indeed be a most welcome move. But let us move on and look at the other points in my piece which no one has thus far talked about.

The four new states under opposition control -- Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor -- are soon going to join Kelantan in being starved of cash. The people of Kelantan endured 18 long years and it appears like they are prepared to face another 18 years without money and with little development. Terengganu, which has the same racial make-up and which fell to the opposition in 1999, lasted only one term under opposition control. In 2004, the state went back to Umno-Barisan Nasional and has remained under ruling coalition control ever since. In spite of the 8 March 2008 political Tsunami which hit most parts of the county, Terengganu did not shift. Umno-Barisan Nasional managed to keep the state and prevented the Tsunami from entering its borders.

That is a more important issue than whether non-Malays should wear a songkok or not. So, if DAP no longer wants to make the headgear matter an issue, then well and good. But that still does not address the matter of: when will the State EXCO be sworn in, who are those in the State EXCO, what portfolios will they hold, have PKR, DAP, and PAS come to an agreement on how many EXCO positions each of the three parties will get, what additional portfolios will the Selangor Menteri Besar get and are his portfolios too little or too many?

And even more important: what is the budget required to run the state to ensure that the operational costs, salaries, loans, etc. can be serviced?

When PAS took over Kelantan in 1990, the state had debts of almost RM700 million. Today, after 18 years, Kelantan's debts are only RM11 million, which is actually just the interest on the loans and which the federal government is squeezing from the state -- the loan amount has all been repaid long ago. And they achieved this without any federal funding. On top of that, the PAS Kelantan government also managed to pay all their operational costs and salaries. No one was retrenched or suffered a salary cut except for the State Assemblymen who are paid just RM3,000 per month, way below what the other states are paying their Assemblymen.

When PAS took Terengganu in 1999, the operational cost, salaries, etc., totalled RM600 million a year. A few months later the federal government withdrew the 5% Oil Royalty of RM800 million a year (now it is about RM1 billion). With the loss of this Oil Royalty, Terengganu's income got reduced from more than RM1 billion to just RM300 million a year. But it's operational cost was double that, RM600 million a year. So how to cover the RM600 million cost with the RM300 million income?

Terengganu slashed its RM600 million expenditure to RM300 million so that it could make ends meet. On top of that, they abolished the toll on the Terengganu Bridge, they abolished cukai pintu (quit rent), and they introduced a welfare system for the poor and needy so that no family living below the poverty level needs to become destitute. Of course, with this type of economic programme, and with the massive federal loans incurred by the previous Umno government also to be serviced, there was absolutely no mega-developments in the state. Unfortunately, the Terengganu citizens are not as degil as the Kelantanese, and in 2004 they decided to give the state back to Umno just so that they could again see development.

As soon as Umno took over in 2004, the Terengganu government reintroduced cukai pintu (they in fact tried to claim the 'back taxes' which had been waived by the previous PAS government but because of wide protests the government abandoned the idea) and now spends RM1 billion a year on frivolous and wasteful projects plus another RM1 billion or so on 'expenses'.

What are we going to see in Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor? Have the new state governments sat down to crunch the figures? Without federal funding, how much money is at the disposal of the states? How much does it cost to run these states and is the income, in the absence of federal funding, enough to pay the cost of running these states?

No, wearing a songkok on your head is not going to solve all these problems. You can even wear a songkok to bed and to the toilet and still you will never be able to balance a deficit budget. We need to know whether we have a government yet in Selangor, the most important of the five states under opposition control, and whether this new government has got its act together and knows what to do. We do not want in five years' time the citizens of Selangor do what the citizens of Terengganu did in 2004, give the state back to Umno-Barisan Nasional because they would rather have federal funding than a clean and efficient government.

Kelantanese are Kelantanese. Even Terengganu can't tahan like Kelantan. Come the next election, will the citizens of Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor act like the Kelantanese or like those from Terengganu? That is what needs to be addressed and can only be addressed once we stop squabbling over how many EXCO positions each party should get and instead get down to running the states.

..................................

Comments (15)Add Comment
...
written by Wisdom above, March 16, 2008 | 15:06:16
Shall all 4 new BR (DAP,PKR,PAS) governments invite the Auditor General Office to audit all 4 State accounts of the Ex- BN states Govt? Federal Law provision.

Does the BN Govt action to withhold federal Fundings to all 5 BR states Govt 'Ultra Vires' the Federal Constitution ?

I appreciate all 'BR' Legal Advisers study all aspects of the Federal Constitution regarding Supply Bills tabled, debated , voted , passed in previous Parliament sittings.

So start cracking your heads, split hair if you have to.

In UK , US , by withholding Federal Funding, you simply fade away ..

Please think as a State Government.

..What I voted for is Barisan Rakyat.

..The collective voices of everybody has to continue

Yes , you are right.

I also cast my ballot for Barisan Rakyat.

Syabas. Barisan Rakyat.

Comments (15)Add Comment
...
written by adisi, March 16, 2008 | 15:08:45
I posted this up on Jeff Ooi's Screenshot on what he could do with Penang's new state administration. I hope this piece would be applicable to all states as well. Hope we can have richer discussion on more important matters.

I would like to echo what RPK has iterated here. Please spend our time on more valuable discussions i.e. what value does it create out of this discussion. So, everybody, please learn to prioritise. Ask yourself are your inputs creating any value or is it just 'juicy' comments. Else, we are all virtually sitting in a meeting room, lazing off like the govt official who spends enormous of time in meetings but nothing happens after that. Action please! Not just talk cock!

Anyway, here's my input to Screenshot (I've deleted unrelated things for our readings here) :

1: Master plan
Persuade the new MBs/CMs to have a master plan of what to be achieved in the first 100 days. Checkout the best practices of new government coming into power. I'm sure internet savvy chap like you guys can find something on the Web. Worst case- Business Turnaround Plan by Idris Jala of MAS would be a good base to start with. Then, once a plan has been conjured up, everybody in the state can start to work towards it. Of course, please engage with people on the plan to get their buy in and agreed by people. This may be a challenge but your plan must fulfil the people's needs. Engagement, engagement, engagement. That is the very basis of how to become transparent!

When a new CEO of a big corporation is appointed, the first 100 days are crucial as it provides some direction to where he/she will be guiding the company.

So, this should go the same to newly appointed state officers (CM/MB & its EXCOs). If you have your plans for the 1st 100 days, kudos! If not, I’d like to suggest that you work it out. Quickly but not half past six kind of job! We’ve had enough of it.

to be continued...

written by adisi, March 16, 2008 | 15:10:02
continue from my previous comment...

2: Org. Structure, Job Management & Pay Philosophy
Work on the Organisational Structure, Job Management & Pay Philosophy. Okay these bits are a bit technical from Human Resource (HR) point of view but I hope you would really consider this in coming out with new Org chart and the jobs that would come with it that would eventually put the state governance in good standards, at par with world class standards.

A good and strong organisation has a robust structure that can withstand the changes both internally and externally but still deliver what it is required to do. So, make sure you have a good org. structure.

Then, secondly, analyse each job in the org chart since different job would have different size (i.e. impact, decision making power, complexity of jobs/works need to be done etc). Get these jobs evaluated and pay people at that job accordingly.

With that, decide what pay philosophy (some call rewards philosophy) you want to engage on. This is where I’d like to highlight a little bit the success of Singapore’s government in wooing people into the government because Singapore gov’t recruit the best out of the best to run the government. I believe this should be the case too for our country but unfortunately, talents in government are not the ‘best of the best’ and are normally leftovers where the best ones have gone to private sector. So, in order to attract, retain and motivate the best talent in the government, you might want to really study what kind of pay philosophy you should be looking at. For instance, I think Singapore’s govt aims to pay the best in the country, even better than the private sector since their impact of the job is bigger. So, have a thought about it because the younger generation of people are quite money minded that you need the carrot and stick to incentive them. Reward people because of their performances. Once the talents are well taken care of, they will give you the best! Then you’ll have group of talents that are really performance based people that in returns should be fulfilling what the people expect out of the government. If they don’t perform, kick their backs out of the government like how General Electric does with their underperformers.

All of the things I’ve said above can be worked out with established HR consultants. And don’t worry; I ain’t selling anything to you because I am definitely not a consultant, but just a young fellow who sees the importance of these things in any organisation. For the sake of your organisation, have good thought of it. If all of this sounds very naïve & novice, pardon me but it works freaking well in big big big corporations.

All the above would address some issues related to the operational cost(OPEX) and best that we spend on putting the right structure/support in the state.

I hope any state leaders who reads this can consider the items I have raised above as it will definitely help managing the state better. Without the right talent, you'll never get work done thus fail to meet people's need - read that your voters. Then come next general election, we all can just be like our friends in Terengganu.